Re: for the "love of HURD"

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   > The Hurd does not belong to the FSF in anyway.  The FSF might be
   > the copyright holders, but they are not the owners of the Hurd.
   > Anyone can take the Hurd and make a fork of it, and many users
   > have their own private versions of the Hurd with their local
   > hacks.

   Alfred: the copyright holder is, in law the holder of rights in the
   work. Legally, they are the owner.

Legally they are the copyright holders, not the owners.  You are
mixing property law, where you have owners, and copyright law where
you have copyright holders.  Two vastly different concepts, that mix
as well as oil and water.