[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?
From: |
Burkhard Plaum |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3? |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:05:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023) |
Hi,
Peter Creath schrieb:
On 11/5/07, R. Bernstein <address@hidden> wrote:
Karl Berry recently asked about changing libcdio from GPL version 2 to
GPL version 3. See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html for
info.
Karl has also generously volunteered to make the changes.
Any thoughts, comments, objections, or ... (what's the opposite of
"objections")?
Am I right that all projects using libcdio would be forced into GPLv3 then?
If that's the case, I would prefer "GPLv2 or later".
I'm not following the discussions regarding GPLv2 vs GPLv3 too closely,
but it seems to be a controversial topic.
Or are there any libcdio specific license problems/inclarities, which
would be solved by moving to GPLv3? Or would it just be because of that
article?
Burkhard
- [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, R. Bernstein, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, Karl Berry, 2007/11/22
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, Burkhard Plaum, 2007/11/23
- [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Burkhard Plaum, 2007/11/23
- [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Burkhard Plaum, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Karl Berry, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, Karl Berry, 2007/11/23