[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?
From: |
R. Bernstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:25:19 -0500 |
Burkhard Plaum writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am I right that all projects using libcdio would be forced into GPLv3 then?
> If that's the case, I would prefer "GPLv2 or later".
I don't think so. Karl will be looking this over the end of the week
and will hopefully correct and clarify.
>
> I'm not following the discussions regarding GPLv2 vs GPLv3 too closely,
> but it seems to be a controversial topic.
>
> Or are there any libcdio specific license problems/inclarities, which
> would be solved by moving to GPLv3? Or would it just be because of that
> article?
My understanding is no. Again hopefully Karl will confirm/deny.
- [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, R. Bernstein, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, Karl Berry, 2007/11/22
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, Burkhard Plaum, 2007/11/23
- [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Burkhard Plaum, 2007/11/23
- [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Burkhard Plaum, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Karl Berry, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, Karl Berry, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, R. Bernstein, 2007/11/23