[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib
From: |
Geoff |
Subject: |
Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:23:39 +0100 |
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:11:16 -0500 (CDT)
Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden> wrote:
<snip>
> >
> > I may be exposing more ignorance here, but that is not
> > what I meant. At least in my case it seems (am I
> > wrong?), that LibMagick was built with the libxml2 which
> > was originally under /usr/lib. Thus my
>
> This does seem wrong. As the author of ImageMagick's
> configure script, I can tell you that the configure script
> uses settings from whatever xml2-config script is
> discovered via the executable search path so it is quite
> easy for a maintainer's environment to pick up and use the
> wrong libxml2. Feel free to blame that on bad design. :-(
>
> This is worth reporting as a bug to your ImageMagick
> package maintainer.
Thanks, - at least this one is not my fault because my
ImageMagick is unchanged from the original Slack 9.1 install
(/var/log/packages/imagemagick-5.5.7_10-i486-1). I guess,
therefore, that I should notify Pat Volkerding.
Geoff
- libtool and /usr/local/lib, Geoff, 2004/09/27
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib, Jacob Meuser, 2004/09/27
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib, Geoff, 2004/09/27
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib, Jacob Meuser, 2004/09/27
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib, Geoff, 2004/09/27
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/27
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib, Jacob Meuser, 2004/09/27
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/27
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib, Geoff, 2004/09/27
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/27
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib,
Geoff <=
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib, Jacob Meuser, 2004/09/27
- Re: libtool and /usr/local/lib, Jacob Meuser, 2004/09/27