[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: review new info on file layout
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: review new info on file layout |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:13:44 -0800 |
On 31-Jan-06, at 12:55 AM, Erik Sandberg wrote:
BTW, is the meaning of the word 'indent' well-known among
non-programmers? In
Excellent point! I think I'll reformat the whole chapter 4 with this
distinction (programmers vs. non-programmers) in mind.
- The outer braces should be << >> (using {} generates incorrect
output)
Thanks, fixed.
- The following is a bit misleading:
\context Staff = singer <<
\context Voice = vocal { \melody }
\lyricsto vocal \new Lyrics { \text }
The lyrics context is not part of the Staff context,
Really? That's a pity; it would help to keep things simple. Anyway,
thanks! I didn't know that.
The correct way would be:
\context Staff = singer <<
\context Voice = vocal { \melody }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto vocal { \text }
Thanks, fixed in CVS.
(I think there's a minor pedagogical point in saying \new Lyrics before
\lyricsto, since the \new Lyrics really isn't a relevant argument of
the
music function, and because all other contexts start with context
names)
You could of course use \addlyrics instead.
I still haven't used lyrics -- what do you recommend? We should
probably use the same thing here as we do in the Example templates...
what should those ones be?
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: review new info on file layout,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: review new info on file layout, Don Blaheta, 2006/02/02
- Re: review new info on file layout, Erik Sandberg, 2006/02/03
- Re: review new info on file layout, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/02/03
- Re: review new info on file layout, Erik Sandberg, 2006/02/03
- Re: review new info on file layout, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/02/04
- Re: review new info on file layout, Graham Percival, 2006/02/06
- Re: review new info on file layout, Erik Sandberg, 2006/02/07
- Re: review new info on file layout, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/02/07