[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tremolo positioning
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: Tremolo positioning |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:21:01 +1100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.3 |
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:55, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Joe Neeman wrote:
> I've just realised that I caused a regression for tremolos
> > on whole notes. I'll fix that today.
>
> Please do.
Here we are:
2006-03-30 Joe Neeman <address@hidden>
* lily/stem-tremolo.cc (print): for whole notes (and breves, etc.)
position the tremolo based on the position of the notehead.
* input/regression/stem-tremolo.ly: add example of unbeamed eighth
notes and update the texidoc line with the new positioning rules.
>
> >> Can you look at the regtests
> >> stem-tremolos.ly and stem-tremolo-position.ly (your file), and refactor
> >> them so they don't have overlaps?
> >
> > For some reason I didn't find the stem-tremolos.ly test when I first went
> > looking for regressions... maybe I can just combine them into one file?
> > There are only one or two examples that are in the new regression test
> > and not in the old one.
>
> Suer. Don't forget to copy the relevant descriptions.
tremolo_20060330.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: Tremolo positioning, (continued)
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/29
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/29
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Juergen Reuter, 2006/03/29
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/29
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/29
- Re: Tremolo positioning,
Joe Neeman <=
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/30
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/30
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/30
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/30