lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem with partial


From: Juergen Reuter
Subject: Re: Problem with partial
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:31:11 +0200 (CEST)


Ah, ok; I understand. Still, I think that using \partial in this situation is kind of abuse that accidentally works. I guess the real problem here is that lily models repeat signs as bar lines; but I am also wondering how a repeat sign should actually look like, if it does not coincide with the bound of a bar (it probably should not consist of a vertical line)...

Greetings,
Juergen

On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Mats Bengtsson wrote:

One common example where people today use it in the middle of a score is repeats, where the repeat sign is in the middle of a bar (especially in combination with prima/secunda volta). Currently, LilyPond doesn't automatically take this into account. Of course, the best solution in this situation would be if LilyPond treated the measure position correctly for repeats.

 /Mats

Quoting Juergen Reuter <address@hidden>:

Hi all,

please note that \partial or \upbeat, whatever you call it, has musicologically a special meaning: the first, incomplete bar, and the last bar of a piece or of a major section of a piece (typically the bar before the next "||" bar glyph) should sum up to a complete bar.

For example, if a song with 4/4 meter starts with "\partial 4 f4", the last bar should, by convention, have a total length of 3 quarter notes. Having said that, you never should use "\partial" or "\upbeat" somewhere within a piece. If lily nevertheless accepts it within a piece without issuing an error or warning, I consider this a bug.

Having a bar within a piece that differs in length from the foreassigned meter is a different concept.

Greetings,
Juergen


On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Graham Percival wrote:

Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 17:54, Graham Percival wrote:
IMO, \partial is just fine.  If there's some confusion, by all means we
can clarify the docs.  As always, I gratefully accept any specific
recommendations for doc changes.

IMHO using \partial in the middle of a bar is confusing; I think there should be some other command that sets the length of an individual bar. Do you think it would make sense to invent such a command?

I'd rather keep the behavior of \partial -- ie "add an extra X duration to this bar", rather than "this bar should have X duration". That said, I suppose we could rename \partial to \addTime or something like that. I don't think that \upbeat is appropriate, but we could find some other name.

Cheers,
- Graham


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel



_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel








reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]