Re: Change of line-width in docs

[Trevor Daniels]

Graham Percival wrote Saturday, September 12, 2009 12:00 AM
>

> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:16:28PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > The change from 160\mm to 5\in shortens the line
> > by around 33\mm, which wrecks at least one
> > example
>
> It was not deliberate to change the docs lnie-width.

I that case I'd like to change it back.

It appears to be a side effect of some other 
change to lilypond-book, which I suspect now 
picks up 'smallbook' rather than 'A4' for ly 
fragments.

I'll try to track it down when I have a bit
more time to do a binary search, unless someone
else has a idea what might have caused this.  

In the meantime I'll add line-width to the 
@lilypond command for the broken fragment in 
LM 5.4.3 with a comment.  As this fragment 
relies on the line-width being above a certain 
value that is probably sensible anyway.

Trevor