Re: Change of line-width in docs

[Graham Percival]

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Saturday, September 12, 2009 12:00 AM
>> It was not deliberate to change the docs lnie-width.
>
> I that case I'd like to change it back.

No argument here.  :)

> It appears to be a side effect of some other change to lilypond-book, 
> which I suspect now picks up 'smallbook' rather than 'A4' for ly  
> fragments.
>
> I'll try to track it down when I have a bit
> more time to do a binary search, unless someone
> else has a idea what might have caused this.  

It might have been me moving @afourpaper into a shared macro for
texinfo.  That happened within the past two weeks.  Then again,
AFAIK the change could have happened months ago with nobody
noticing.

> In the meantime I'll add line-width to the @lilypond command for the 
> broken fragment in LM 5.4.3 with a comment.

No; please don't.  It doesn't matter if it looks bad in a -devel
release, and this will force us to fix the underlying issue.

You could add an item to the tracker if you're concerned about
this getting lost.

Cheers,
- Graham

PS my emails directly to you are getting rejected again.  It's
just possible it's something on my end, though.  In a few days I
should have my elec.gla.ac.uk account, and then we can communicate
via a reliable channel while we investigate it.