[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: website issues and comment-discussion
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: website issues and comment-discussion |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:06:33 +0100 |
Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010 à 10:03 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Because I'm a bad person and should be taken to task over it? I
> always mean to go back and fix it,
I didn't intend to do anything else with the comment I added. There are
many other issues with the website I'm going to report accompanied with
a patch, but for this one I was stuck on making any good suggestion, so
I dumped a comment. Remember that you told me the website was ready
enough for translations, so I didn't expect to find such an almost empty
node without a @help red box or comment; I didn't want to complain by
email without any suggestion, because you've already expressed enough
your deception about the lack of contributors to the website, so I just
dumped this comment, and will do it again whenever such a sitation
arises again and there is no dedicated person to work on the website.
> but I keep on getting dragged into
> working on other things.
You work on so many things that you can't make sure to fix and polish
all of them yourself, and I still see nothing wrong that you put some
comments in the source rather than writing it on a private list or
sending an email in a time frame when nobody else is available for
tackling it.
> Keep a piece of paper next to your computer. I have two sheets of
> lilypond material; I cross of items as I get to them. When one sheet
> is about 80% full, I copy any remaining items on to a new piece of
> paper.
I have such a note using Gnote of my GNOME computer desktop, which is
more than enough for what I do related to LilyPond, because I don't have
to quickly draw diagrams and tables like in math.
> Hmm. The info on that page doesn't need to be in the info and pdf,
> right?
That's correct.
> If that's true, then it could just be an offhanging html file
> like the current translations.html.in. (with the link from the
> footer, as in the old webpage)
The contents of these two files should be included and surrounded with
@ifhtml, so that the HTML files use the CSS and have the navigation bar.
I won't look at this before next week-end, though, as I'm busy going
back to Italy this week.
> > If we keep this node, then we should add some more text, maybe taking
> > inspiration from the introduction of the essay on the old website.
>
> I'm not opposed to adding more text to that node.
You deleted my comment, but I haven't found where is this issue
registered now; this is not very productive.
Best,
John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée