[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rietveld workflow problems
From: |
Peekay Ex |
Subject: |
Re: Rietveld workflow problems |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:39:01 +0100 |
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:35 AM, address@hidden
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, I run into the same problem from time to time - I
> recently sent an e-mail to the list about a 1-line patch to fix kneed beams
> that I needed to apply for other work.
So, and this is a genuine question, why do you need to make a tiny
patch so that a (next) larger patch works. Why not include the tiny
patch in your larger patch (if that makes sense)?
And without wishing to sound rude rude, are we just blaming the tool
here for 'your preference' of work flow?
regards
--
--
James
- Re: Rietveld workflow problems, (continued)
- Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/09/21
- Re: Rietveld workflow problems, David Kastrup, 2011/09/21
- Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/09/21
- Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/21
- Re: Rietveld workflow problems, David Kastrup, 2011/09/21
- Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/21
- Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Carl Sorensen, 2011/09/21
- Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Graham Percival, 2011/09/21
- Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/22
- Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Carl Sorensen, 2011/09/22
Re: Rietveld workflow problems,
Peekay Ex <=
Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/09/21
Re: Rietveld workflow problems, David Kastrup, 2011/09/21
Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/21
Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Graham Percival, 2011/09/21
Re: Rietveld workflow problems, Keith OHara, 2011/09/21