On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:03:21PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
You know, I'm wondering if this serves any purpose. It's a
humungous thing that takes an age to load and display, and for a
long time has had a load of missing images, bad links, etc. No-one
complained much and no-one really seemed to notice. Yet we lose the
images on web-examples and get a user report same day.
Given the shenanigans needed to create it, might it make sense to retire
it?
When the new website was first being built, there was a huge
outcry when I suggested not bothering with it.
I'd rather keep it around, at least for a bit longer, because it
serves as a canary. Is the doc build system as generic as we
need? no. (note that there's a few pictures in other manuals;
it's not just web-big-html that needs them) Is the doc build
system as well-organized as we need? of course not.
I think we can do a huge amount of work just by cleaning up the
"make website" process. Admittedly that doesn't include
web-big-html, but the increased understanding and simplifications
should have follow-on effects to "make doc".
Cheers,
- Graham