Re: Update lilygit.tcl (Issue 2092) (issue 5504092)

[dak]

On 2011/12/30 20:57:02, Graham Percival wrote:
> Patchy will not question any
> ridiculous git history that arises due to any kind of weird series of
commands
> in git.

Maybe it would make sense if Patchy refused fast forwarding over a
history involving a merge _from_ staging.  I think that merges should
just be from master; a merge from staging implies a merging pull, and I
can't think of a situation where we would want to see those in the
history of master.

http://codereview.appspot.com/5504092/