Re: Update lilygit.tcl (Issue 2092) (issue 5504092)

[Graham Percival]

On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:10:14AM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> On 2011/12/30 20:57:02, Graham Percival wrote:
> >I'm still concerned about this type of automatic pushing.  The revised
> CG
> >material on branches
> >     http://codereview.appspot.com/5484043/
> >makes a bit deal about always checking gitk -- just for 5 seconds --
> before
> >pushing, and I think that's a good step.  Patchy will not question any
> 
> I think I can achieve that automatically by looking at the commit log
> between staging and working.  If there are no merge commits in that log,
> we are good to push IIUC.

Hmm.  Could I interest you in adding some checks to Patchy?  I'd
rather have that complexity in Patchy rather than lily-git.tcl --
that way, it doesn't matter if anything weird happens on a
command-line or within lily-git; we're still protected.

Cheers,
- Graham