lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question


From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:22:45 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:57:34AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > If so, there's no problem.  But I would doubt that they have such a
> > policy -- and getting the FSF investigated due to tax evasion or
> > something would suck.  I like to be extra-cautious when it comes to
> > money and legal affairs.
> 
> The FSF are perfectly equipped to deal with money and legal affairs as
> cautious as necessary.  But you should not wait until the last minute
> for checking out the details and getting them to act.

Definitely.

> I seem to remember that Karl Berry was somewhat involved with the GSoC
> guidelines for the FSF: perhaps informally asking him how to proceed
> might get you on track fastest.

Good idea!  Janek, please email Karl Berry, cc'd to me.

- Graham



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]