[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:09:06 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:53:52PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Maybe wait 12 hours in case somebody else wants to do it, then try
> > to contact the FSF yourself. Applications start tomorrow and only
> > run for a bit over a week,
>
> ??
> According to
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2012/faqs#timeline
> applications start on Monday, Feb 27 and end on March 9.
oops, yes. Maybe I thought that "2" and "7" look kind-of similar,
so tomorrow's date of "22" could be interpreted as "27" ?
> > I don't think so. And if we have the FSF handle the tax side of
> > things, I think they get the money. They might want to keep it --
> > at the very least, if we wanted to use that money, I think we'd
> > need to submit a budget or expense claim or something.
>
> I don't quite get it why we would want to do so. but...
If the money gets to sent to the FSF as a vendor under the google
checkout system, it shows up in their bank account. As a
registered non-profit, they need to account for money coming in
and out, otherwise it looks like they're doing money laundering.
Maybe they have a set policy for dealing with GSoC and won't blink
an eye at forwarding that money to a personal paypal account. If
so, there's no problem. But I would doubt that they have such a
policy -- and getting the FSF investigated due to tax evasion or
something would suck. I like to be extra-cautious when it comes
to money and legal affairs.
- Graham
- GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Janek Warchoł, 2012/02/16
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Graham Percival, 2012/02/16
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, David Kastrup, 2012/02/16
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/02/16
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Janek Warchoł, 2012/02/21
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Graham Percival, 2012/02/21
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Janek Warchoł, 2012/02/21
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, David Kastrup, 2012/02/22
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Graham Percival, 2012/02/22
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Janek Warchoł, 2012/02/22
Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/02/17