[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LoMuS
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: LoMuS |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:45:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
"address@hidden" <address@hidden> writes:
> Hey all,
>
> I've received a couple e-mails from colleagues and one nudge from
> Valentin about:
>
> http://concours.afim-asso.org/
>
> I've been reticent about applying because the development community is
> rather diffuse and there isn't any good way to accept the prize money
> if we win. However, after having received now two e-mails from people
> who I respect a lot in the French computer music community, I think
> it'd be a good idea and that we should let institutional barriers stop
> us from applying.
>
> I'm OK with writing up the application (due the 29th) but before I do,
> people would need to agree on where the prize money would go if we
> won. My two thoughts are:
>
> 1) Use it internally on projects (i.e. we'd all agree that person X
> would get paid Z euros to do thing Y) in which case there'd have to be
> a money shepherd. I'd rather not do this, but I can if no one else
> wants to.
> 2) Donate it to GNU.
We already donate LilyPond to GNU, so I'd lean towards 1). There are
several unsexy infrastructure projects (meaning that if, say, I chose to
tackle them, I would slow down to a crawl) which might get sexed up in
that manner. And there are several projects requiring a coordinated
amount of heavy lifting which might get tackled with that kind of
encouragement. One thing is the skylines stuff, another would be
Guilev2 migration. Paying the prize out once a month without regression
from that area passes will certainly be a strong incentive, and probably
will collect more interest than one would have imagined.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: LoMuS, (continued)
- Re: LoMuS, Graham Percival, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, Graham Percival, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, Janek Warchoł, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, Janek Warchoł, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/28
Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS,
David Kastrup <=
Re: LoMuS, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/04/27
LoMus, address@hidden, 2012/04/30