[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LoMuS
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: LoMuS |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:15:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:26:16AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
>
> On 27 avr. 2012, at 08:07, Graham Percival wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:09:39AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> >> I'd be good to set a precedent for this now so that LilyPond can apply
> >> to other software competitions in the future.
> >
> > *sigh*
>
> I'll formulate my question differently. If anyone on the development team
> sends me an e-mail saying "Do not submit LilyPond to LoMuS", I won't submit
> LilyPond to LoMuS.
So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick
answer about this specific case? I guess the general consensus is
"go ahead and we'll figure it out later".
- Graham
- LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/27
- Re: LoMuS, Graham Percival, 2012/04/27
- Re: LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/27
- Re: LoMuS,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, Graham Percival, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, Janek Warchoł, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, Janek Warchoł, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/28
Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/27