[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LoMuS
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: LoMuS |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:53:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> 3) it's not going to be enough. Companies and government grants
> are where the real money for supporting programmers comes from;
> hiring just one person from individual donations would require far
> more users than we have.
Not enough is better than nothing if we are not talking about
_financing_ developments but rather rewarding them. And in that case
this is not a question of sustainability, but more or less a question of
agreeing on things that people will be glad enough to get done by
somebody else to not hold a grudge.
In other news, I have to admit being impressed so far by what our users
are willing to give to sustain development at least from a single
person. Yes, it would require far more users to seem like a fair deal
for everyone: a few selected contributors pitch in a whole lot more than
others. But then, of course, this is not so much different from the
distribution of non-monetary contributions.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: LoMuS, (continued)
- Re: LoMuS, Graham Percival, 2012/04/27
- Re: LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/27
- Re: LoMuS, Graham Percival, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, Graham Percival, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, Janek Warchoł, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, Janek Warchoł, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/28
Re: LoMuS,
David Kastrup <=
Re: LoMuS, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/04/27
LoMus, address@hidden, 2012/04/30