Re: LoMuS

[Graham Percival]

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
> 
> > So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick
> > answer about this specific case?  I guess the general consensus is
> > "go ahead and we'll figure it out later".
> > 
> 
> I *do* want this to work so well that it sets a solid precedent,

If this is going to set a precedent, then I will say "Do not
submit LilyPond to LoMuS".  I'm willing to go along with the
current consensus only if there is the understanding that it does
*not* set a precedent.

> I get the sense in a way that the precedent has already been set - if someone 
> sees a cool opportunity (GSoC, LoMuS, whatever), email the list to call dibs 
> if dibs must be called, make sure no one is opposed, apply, and do something 
> fair with the money if money is to be gotten.  In the GSoC case, Janek has 
> $500 that he'll be donating to the organization in whatever way he sees fit.

That is not what happened.  Google is paying Janek $4500 directly.
Carl is getting $500 for the project, which I guess he will spend
how he sees fit.

- Graham