Re: Doc: mention empty chords; avoid using zero-duration spacers in examples (issue 6197068)

[dak]

On 2012/05/11 07:55:48, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Houston, we have a problem.


http://codereview.appspot.com/6197068/diff/1/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
> File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):


http://codereview.appspot.com/6197068/diff/1/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode89
> Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely:89: r4 e8( g <>) ^"sul D" \f
\>
> \repeat unfold 8 { c-. } r2\!
> Going back to the original example and the attempt to use <>\! to
terminate the
> decresc, it seems there is also a pitfall with <>.  The decresc can be
> terminated with a note or rest of any duration, but <>\! can only be
used if it
> happens to fall on a bar line.  If it doesn't LP complains that the
bounds are
> not breakable.  This seems a serious drawback to me.

Is that more like a spanner problem or a chord problem?  It is different
if you use something like c1*0?

http://codereview.appspot.com/6197068/