[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [talk] easy tuplets
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: [talk] easy tuplets |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:51:43 +0200 |
2012/9/24 Janek Warchoł <address@hidden>:
> Seriously though, i think this syntax would be very useful for
> algorithmic composers and computer programs manipulating Lily code.
> Another advantage is code readability and ease of copying it (shall i
> elaborate?)
>
> Besides, it's not like we would loose any functionality: \times would
> still be there.
This convinces me. I'm for it.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, (continued)
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, David Kastrup, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Francisco Vila, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Keith OHara, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Keith OHara, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, David Kastrup, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Benkő Pál, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, David Kastrup, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/25
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Ian Hulin, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Keith OHara, 2012/09/25
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/25
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, James, 2012/09/25