Re: stencils: let some stencils carry a box-extent; issue 3255 (issue 9295044)

[Trevor Daniels]

address@hidden wrote Wednesday, June 12, 2013 6:42 AM

> I disagree.  There is harm in having both since it makes people think
> about which to use in which situation.  Since we have \pad-x and \pad-y,
> \pad-around makes more sense to keep.  Not only does the name help with
> knowing just what is padded, but also we don't tend to put "markup" in
> command names redundantly.
> 
> If we don't like convert-ly, we can just keep an undocumented
> compatibility function.  Or document it as "exists only for historical
> reasons and is the same as pad-around".

I agree.  Leave it available but documented as David suggests only in 
code comments.
 
> https://codereview.appspot.com/9295044/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel