|
From: | Mike Solomon |
Subject: | Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ? |
Date: | Sat, 14 Dec 2013 10:37:45 +0200 |
On Dec 14, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Keith OHara <address@hidden> wrote:On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 23:05:49 -0800, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:That does not make sense. If you want call-once behavior, you can just Excellent observation. Currently, unpure-pure-containers to which one passes one function/argument use that function/constant for both the pure and unpure parts. What you want to do is cache the pure result, not unlike Item::cache_pure_height (Interval height) [line 247 of item.cc]. I’m a fan of:
Cheers, MS |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |