lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ligature issue 2656 (was Re: Ghostscript 9.15)


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: ligature issue 2656 (was Re: Ghostscript 9.15)
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:12:02 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Masamichi HOSODA <address@hidden> writes:

> I've succeed GUB's ``make lilypond'' by pango-1.28.3 in this branch.
> https://github.com/trueroad/gub/tree/pango-1.28
>
> I've checked again.
> I've installed DejaVuSans to all environments.
>
>   linux-64 binary on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64 bit:
>   linux-x86 binary on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64 bit:
>   linux-x86 binary on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 32 bit:
>   linux-ppc binary on Debian PPC:
>   freebsd-64 binary on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE 64 bit:
>   freebsd-x86 binary on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE 64 bit:
>   freebsd-x86 binary on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE 32 bit:
>   mingw binary on Windows 8.1 64 bit:
>     Ligatured PDFs are generated in all environments.
>
>   darwin-x86 binary:
>     Untested
>     My Intel Mac environment was quite a temporary.
>     Now, I don't have it.
>
>   darwin-ppc binary:
>     Untested
>     I can't prepare PowerPC Mac.

I think (but can't guarantee it) that the original report showed
characters from the same font.  So it might have been a different issue
than the one caused by having different platform fonts involved.

At any rate, it would appear that at the current point of time, a
variant of the actual problem, whether it is the original problem or
not, exists mainly for the situation of Pango choosing platform fonts
without explicit and/or intentional instructions to do so.

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]