lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ghostscript 9.15


From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: Ghostscript 9.15
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:06:26 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0



Am 25.03.2015 um 09:35 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:

Am 25.03.2015 um 09:01 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
We don't use any particular font for sans-serif and
monospace. LilyPond simply calls the OS's default here.  Which is
something I'd like to raise (once more?): Would it be an option to
find suitable complementing fonts here, ship them with LilyPond and
make them the default?
As first measure we should just use one of the 11 or so standard
PostScript fonts.  Probably Helvetica and Courier for sans serif and
monospace, respectively.
Mhmm.  If we are going to ship a sans-serif font, I strongly recommend
something prettier than those two butt-ugly fonts.
Ehm, just to be sure: Would we have to ship these fonts in the
LilyPond distribution or could we consider them present anyway?
They are required fonts.  Now shipping and installing fonts of our own
additionally would not make a fundamental difference since we are
shipping and installing our own music fonts anyway.  But fonts with a
reasonably complete coverage of Unicode do not exactly tend to fall from
the trees and take a lot of space.

Do I get this right: Setting Helvetica and Courier as default would not require us to add fonts to LilyPond's installer?

If this is the case I would ask for the following:

1) Set these fonts as default.
This is not sufficient from the perspective of LilyPond's aesthetics but it would stop the inacceptable state of scores compiling differently on different systems. This should be a straightforward, small patch that should be done independently from 2) (I just don't know where to start with that).

2) Find suitable fonts and include them in the distribution
I know this is a more difficult issue than 1) but I think it would be worth it. By default LilyPond scores don't use sans or monospace (IISC) but I think LilyPond should actually provide beautiful defaults for these too. Maybe it would be a good start looking for fonts in the same sources as CenturySchoolbook?

Urs



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]