lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 3799: New satb.ly built-in template and template framework (is


From: tdanielsmusic
Subject: Re: Issue 3799: New satb.ly built-in template and template framework (issue 225860043 by address@hidden)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 10:13:20 +0000

message: On 2015/04/08 01:54:02, Dan Eble wrote:
Thanks for looking, Dan

To support TTBB, would you generalize this template further, or would
you create
something new?

My intention is to add an ssaattbb template once this patch has been
installed.  This would have three staves for each part: s1, s2 and s,
etc, with separate TwoVoicesPerStaff controls for each part.  This would
make it easy to produce TTBB or any other combination of doubled parts.

(Of course you could produce a TTBB score now, with satb.ly, by simply
writing SopranoMusic = TenorOneMusic, with SopranoInstrumentName =
"Tenor 1", etc, but that's a bit clunky.)

How about factoring out the parts that are used within a \score into
their own
file so that they can be included many times in a multi-score book?

Now that's worth considering.  I'll look into that.  My reason for not
providing a score tkit in the present submission was the large number of
parameters that would need to be passed, and I didn't have a convincing
use case, but you've just suggested a better approach and a possible use
case.

How about using the part combiner?  (That reminds me I have some work
to do.)

If you mean for the case when TwoVoicesPerStaff is true, it would make
it difficult to associate lyrics with voices.  If you mean for Women or
Men voices or for Piano accompaniment, then of course you can do this
yourself within the provided music, but again the lyric associations
would be problematic.

How about supporting (to some extent) alternate lyrics above/below the
staff for
the outer voices?

I think this would be best accommodated in the future ssaattbb template
I mentioned above, since alternate lyrics usually implies split voices.

Trevor


https://codereview.appspot.com/225860043/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]