Re: Add Code of Conduct (issue 575620043 by address@hidden)

[David Kastrup]

Mike Solomon <address@hidden> writes:

> One procedural question: what are acceptance procedures for a PR like
> this? There is good debate and a variety of opinions, but at a certain
> point we will need to make a decision - do we implement the CoC or
> not?

What does "implement" mean?

> I doubt that any new arguments will emerge on either side.  David has
> made several good arguments against it,

I would not call them "good" as much as "personal".

> and while the points are valid, they don't outweigh IMO the potential
> for it to improve the problem of low contribution volume and a
> shrinking pool of developers. I'm also admittedly biased in that I
> don't feel comfortable contributing unless there is a code of conduct
> with clear steps for reporting violations and consequences for repeat
> offenders, so I'm probably not the best person to make the final call.
>
> ~Mike
>
>

-- 
David Kastrup