[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: docker for CI
From: |
Kevin Barry |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: docker for CI |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Feb 2020 20:22:29 +0000 |
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:21:35PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Proposal: rather than using the patchy scripts for validating
> LilyPond, we use docker images.
Without getting into technical details, I think this is a really good
idea. Automatic building/testing saves lots of time, and having a
containerised build environment means it can be as portable as a single
dockerfile (or one for each version of guile, if that is what you were
thinking).
Kevin
P.S. I think I have seen a dockerfile for creating a build environment
for LilyPond somewhere. I wonder whether an official docker file would
be beneficial in its own right - at least for Linux users, it would
decouple the build environment from the OS packages.
Re: RFC: docker for CI,
Kevin Barry <=
Re: RFC: docker for CI, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/02/07
Re: RFC: docker for CI, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/02/08
Re: RFC: docker for CI, Janek Warchoł, 2020/02/08