[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Sep 2021 15:51:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> writes:
> Le 25/09/2021 à 14:44, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> Aaron Hill <lilypond@hillvisions.com> writes:
>>> Still, be pedantic and miss the forest for the trees, my point was
>>> that \x is a good option if \* was going to be problematic.
>> Sure, but the problem with \× is exactly that × is not part of ASCII and
>> thus does not uniformly work on extended ASCII encodings (of which the
>> non-8-bit UTF-8 encoding that LilyPond uses for representing code points
>> in the Latin-1 specific subrange of Unicode is only one).
>
> You did realize that Aaron talked about the good option being \x and not \×?
You did realize that Aaron previously to \x declared \× to be an option,
stating that code point D7 was part of ASCII, then insisted that the
ASCII standard magically switched to becoming 8 bit at some point of
time?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, (continued)
Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, David Kastrup, 2021/09/25
Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, Aaron Hill, 2021/09/25
Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/09/25
Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, Dan Eble, 2021/09/28
Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/09/29
Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/09/29