Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold

[Lukas-Fabian Moser]

> > But your special-character argument made me think: Maybe it would be
> > possible to get rid of the * sign? Maybe I'm missing something, but
> > isn't \{unsigned int} still "available" so one could do \16 d8 instead
> > of \*16 d8 ? Of course, probably only David K. can say for sure what
> > implications that would have for parasing/lexing.
> Guitarists (among other string instrument players) would likely object
> to losing string number specifications.

I _knew_ I was missing something. Thanks.

(I stupidly only tried { \4 c' }. Even { \4 c' \4 d' } would have been 
enough to remind me of string numbers.)

Lukas