Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold

[David Kastrup]

Lukas-Fabian Moser <lfm@gmx.de> writes:

> But your special-character argument made me think: Maybe it would be
> possible to get rid of the * sign? Maybe I'm missing something, but
> isn't \{unsigned int} still "available" so one could do \16 d8 instead
> of \*16 d8 ? Of course, probably only David K. can say for sure what
> implications that would have for parasing/lexing.

Guitarists (among other string instrument players) would likely object
to losing string number specifications.

-- 
David Kastrup