[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:56:04 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.1b.201012 |
On 9/27/21, 3:52 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
<lilypond-devel-bounces+carl.d.sorensen+digest=gmail.com@gnu.org on behalf of
dak@gnu.org> wrote:
Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> writes:
> is not entirely true: once a function is defined, it can be
> relied on internally. Imagine my embarrassment when I had to
> explain on -user-fr the cause of the error occurring with
> the code (minimized here):
>
> cons = \markup \tiny "conséquent"
But doesn't this redefine the scheme symbol 'cons ?
Carl
>
> {
> \stemDown
> c'2^\cons
> \undo \stemDown
> c'2
> }
That code works fine here and produces the expected result:
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, (continued)
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, David Kastrup, 2021/09/25
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, Dan Eble, 2021/09/25
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, David Kastrup, 2021/09/25
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, Dan Eble, 2021/09/25
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, David Kastrup, 2021/09/25
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/09/27
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, David Kastrup, 2021/09/27
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, David Kastrup, 2021/09/27
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/09/28
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, David Kastrup, 2021/09/28
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, David Kastrup, 2021/09/27
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2021/09/28
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, David Kastrup, 2021/09/28
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2021/09/28
- Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, David Kastrup, 2021/09/28
Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold, David Kastrup, 2021/09/25