lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold


From: Carl Sorensen
Subject: Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:56:04 +0000
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.1b.201012


On 9/27/21, 3:52 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup" 
<lilypond-devel-bounces+carl.d.sorensen+digest=gmail.com@gnu.org on behalf of 
dak@gnu.org> wrote:

    Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> writes:
    
    > is not entirely true: once a function is defined, it can be
    > relied on internally. Imagine my embarrassment when I had to
    > explain on -user-fr the cause of the error occurring with
    > the code (minimized here):
    >
    > cons = \markup \tiny "conséquent"
But doesn't this redefine the scheme symbol 'cons ?

Carl

    >
    > {
    >   \stemDown
    >   c'2^\cons
    >   \undo \stemDown
    >   c'2
    > }
    
    That code works fine here and produces the expected result:
    


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]