Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold

[David Kastrup]

Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@byu.edu> writes:

> On 9/27/21, 3:52 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
> <lilypond-devel-bounces+carl.d.sorensen+digest=gmail.com@gnu.org on
> behalf of dak@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>     Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> writes:
>     
>     > is not entirely true: once a function is defined, it can be
>     > relied on internally. Imagine my embarrassment when I had to
>     > explain on -user-fr the cause of the error occurring with
>     > the code (minimized here):
>     >
>     > cons = \markup \tiny "conséquent"
> But doesn't this redefine the scheme symbol 'cons ?
>
> Carl

Only in the current parser module.  You'll have lots of fun using "cons"
in code defined _afterwards_.  But the references of preexisting code
remain to the Guile primitive.

-- 
David Kastrup