Re: Potential LSR licensing violations

[Luca Fascione]

Or you remove it, or you reimplement it

I think having GPL content in the lsr is the least desirable in the long
term, because either folks using it won't notice, or they might find
themselves unable or unwilling to use GPL as part of their content.

I'm not clear what it means to have GPL source in a sheet of which you have
the pdf, it would seem to imply you'd have access to the whole Lilypond
source for it, maybe, if you asked for it. A publisher might be unwilling
to accept such terms, maybe

L

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, 12:45 Jean Abou Samra, <jean@abou-samra.fr> wrote:

>
> And there aren't many solutions. Either we get permission from
> the copyright owners to release it to the public domain, or
> we release it under the GPL instead of the public domain.
>
>
> Jean
>
>