[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 13:00:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 |
Le 20/10/2022 à 15:46, Luca Fascione a écrit :
To be clear: the potential issue I see is when the score or some of
the headers it includes are GPL licensed, of course.
Now of course the boundary between 'score' and 'lilypond plugin' in
our case is particularly blurry, but still, it seems the
question is germane to the discussion at hand.
IMHO, such an interpretation by a court is unlikely. The truth,
as with a number of legal things, is that we will never know for
sure, because (with probability close to 1) no court will ever have
to settle such a case.
Cheers,
Jean
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, (continued)
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Wols Lists, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Kevin Barry, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Luca Fascione, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Luca Fascione, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Luca Fascione, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations,
Jean Abou Samra <=
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Luca Fascione, 2022/10/21
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/21
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Luca Fascione, 2022/10/20
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2022/10/20
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Thomas Morley, 2022/10/20
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/21