Re: LSR update?

[Jean Abou Samra]

Le 27/12/2022 à 16:55, Thomas Morley a écrit :
> I'd volunteer to update all lsr-snippets, though I surely need some help.

Thanks!


> Especially for the snippets in (1) a) b) c)
>
> Your comments below are already helpful.
>
> Lateron, when LSR runs 2.24.0, we need to insert all snippets from
> /Documentation/snippets/new.
> This is tedious, any help would be great.



I hope it will be done by feeding LSR with the updated snippets in
batch and not by editing them one by one... ?



> As final step we need to delete the ones from
> /Documentation/snippets/new and commit the new state,
> I would be very thankful if someone else could do so.


This should be a matter of running makelsr.pl and removing
all snippets from new/ present in stable/2.24, right?


> Out of curiosity and not related to lsr-update, do you have an example
> of 2.22.-code (where Mark_engraver is moved) which would not run in
> 2.24.?




\version "2.22.2"

\layout {
  \context {
    \Score
    \remove Mark_engraver
  }
  \context {
    \Staff
    \consists Mark_engraver
  }
}

<<
  \new Staff { \mark \default c'1 }
  \new Staff { c'1 }
>>



2.22 doesn't print a mark in the second staff, 2.24
does. You have to move Mark_tracking_translator as
well if you don't want it.



> > The latter (\tweak direction #DOWN) is shown in the official docs, maybe
> > we can add a snippet just for it.
> I still think it is usefull.
>
> Btw, the "obsolet"-additions are from you?


Yup.


> Do you think all of the snippets labelled this way should be deleted?


Yes.


> If so, I suggest to upfate them as well and delete them after lsr-update is done


Not sure I understand, why should we update them first if it's to delete 
them immediately?

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature