lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter


From: Jonas Hahnfeld
Subject: Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2023 15:05:50 +0100
User-agent: Evolution 3.46.2

On Fri, 2023-01-06 at 09:39 +0000, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> 
>   LilyPond  extract              GS        size
>   backend   pdfmark  GS          option    of NR  comments
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------
>   standard  no       9.56.1      --        44MB   ok
> 
>   standard  yes      9.56.1      --         6MB   many links missing
>   standard  yes      9.56.1 [1]  NEWPDF=    8MB   ok
>                                  false
>   standard  yes      10.1   [2]  Preserve  29MB   ok
>                                  Marked
>                                  Content
> 
>   cairo     no       9.56.1      --        17MB   ok
>   cairo     yes      9.56.1      --        16MB   many links missing
>   cairo     yes      9.56.1      NEWPDF=   21MB   ok
>                                  false
>   cairo     yes      10.1        Preserve  21MB   ok
>                                  Marked
>                                  Content

Let me add a combination here: Ghostscript 10.01.0 built from current
git (commit 462efa959) yields 28MB with extractpdfmark and working
links (AFAICT), without changes to LilyPond. The reason is likely
http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;h=073c1adebeef38317ae0e6cb0f6d366ddaadb38a
(the linked bug number is wrong, the correct one is
https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705996 ).

Which proves that extractpdfmark works with the new PDF interpreter
(modulo bugs), and the size issue is unrelated (and still unfixed).
QED.

Jonas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]