[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of OpenLilyLib
From: |
Graham King |
Subject: |
Re: Future of OpenLilyLib |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:31:21 +0000 |
> On 22 Nov 2022, at 09:31, Mark Knoop <mark@opus11.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks to all for your responses. There seems to be a general agreement
> about the desired direction but I'd still like to hear who is actually
> using this code at the moment. Is it just Kieren and me?
I've tried to get Scholarly working in the past, but failed. I'm currently
failing to get lyluatex working.
There are some really promising tools in OpenLilyLib, but they seem to require
someone with Urs' level of focus and intellect to use them. This thread is
raising my hopes once more.
- Future of OpenLilyLib, Mark Knoop, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Mark Knoop, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Mark Knoop, 2022/11/22
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Andrew Bernard, 2022/11/22
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Valentin Petzel, 2022/11/22
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib,
Graham King <=
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/23
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Federico Bruni, 2022/11/23
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Graham King, 2022/11/23
Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Valentin Petzel, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2022/11/22
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/22