[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the next version of Lout
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: the next version of Lout |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:35:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Hello Louters!
Jeff Kingston <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:08:08PM +0100, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
>> FWIW I would also prefer Git, which is supported on Savannah, but I
>> think the main criterion is for the tool to be convenient for Jeff.
>
> I don't see this at all. The idea now is to involve others, so
> we want it to be as convenient as possible for as many people as
> possible. Also I'm not sure why one tool would be more convenient
> for me than another, given that I'm not currently a user of any.
Good point. :-) Git is widely perceived as more demanding for someone
learning it than Subversion, but it’s surely not so difficult either.
An introduction that I like is “Git for computer scientists” [0]. It
does not tell much about the commands, but illustrates the main concepts
concisely.
[0] http://eagain.net/articles/git-for-computer-scientists/
> Judging from the responses so far, there seems to be universal
> support for moving to a collaborative project on Savannah using
> Git, provided the project is not allowed to drift away from the
> fairly tight coordination that I have traditionally provided.
Yes.
> So I'll wait a bit longer, do some reading up on Git, and then
> start work on making that happen. Hopefully Ludovic will help
> me over the rough patches.
I’ll do my best. I see Uwe is around these days, which is also
reassuring. :-)
Thanks,
Ludo’.