[lwip-users] RE: [lwip] compilation on kernel 2.2

[Robert Pleh]

Hi, 
I had problems with continuation slashes. The problem was that I unzipped
the code under Windows (WinZIP) and then transferred all files with FTP to
Linux. Seems to me that WinZIP replaced Unix END-LINE characters with
Window's ones - the problems with slashes occurred.
Then I unzipped the code under Linux, the compilation worked without errors.

Reg,
Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: Amol Deshmukh [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:59 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [lwip] compilation on kernel 2.2


Hi,
    I have gcc version 2.91.66. As I said there were problems to compile
lwip-0.4.1.
The code was not compiling because of the continuation slashes i.e '/'
After removing the continuation slashes the code compiled. i.e on rh Linux
6.2.
I could not understand why the code didn't compile because of continuation
slashes.

I downloaded the vtun driver for rh6.2.
The installation fails for dependencies
lzo
liblzo.so.1
libcrypto.so.1
    I could not find the rpm packages for the  above. Could you help me out
in this because I feel compiling from the source would be too difficult.

Thanks and Regards,
Amol

----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Dunkels <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [lwip] compilation on kernel 2.2


> Hi!
>
> On Monday 22 October 2001 14:38, you wrote:
> > Hi,
> >     I tried compiling the lwip-0.4.1 code on Linux 6.2 (kernel 2.2).
> > Following are some of the errors that I got during compilation.
>
> [...]
>
> >     It gave similar problems while compilation of lwip-0.3.1.
> > The code compiles on kernel 2.4 but gives the tunnel interface problem
.....
> > i mean /dev/tap0. As you said in the previous mail that the code works
fine
> > with kernel 2.2 and the vtun/universal tun/tap driver.
>
> Strange. I never had any similar problems under RedHat 6.x and Linux
2.2.x. I
> have also tried to compile lwIP with an old gcc version (2.8.1) to see if
> that was the source of the problem, but that worked fine for me.
>
> Anyone else having any experiences with Linux 2.2? I'll see if I can find
a
> Linux machine and try to compile it.
>
> /adam
> --
> Adam Dunkels <address@hidden>
> http://www.sics.se/~adam
> [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]

[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]

[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]