[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?
From: |
John C. Toman |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ? |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:03:13 -0000 |
I have to agree. I wouldn't be able to use lwIP under GPL, either. LGPL
might work, but I prefer the license the way it is (modified BSD),
because I think it is the most flexible for embedded developers, as Leon
has mentioned.
Regards,
John
Kieran Mansley wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Jani Monoses wrote:
>
>
>
>>I think that plain GPL would drive away many of the current users
>>because lwIP is used along with proprietary programs.That
>>would make even less people contribute.
>>
>>
>
>Yep, I for one could not be involved with a GPL lwip.
>
>Kieran
>
>[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
>
>
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Manik, Raina (IE10), 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Manik, Raina (IE10), 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Rod Boyce, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?,
John C. Toman <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Paul Sheer, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/09