[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ? |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:32:23 -0000 |
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Jani Monoses wrote:
> I think that plain GPL would drive away many of the current users
> because lwIP is used along with proprietary programs.That
> would make even less people contribute.
Yep, I for one could not be involved with a GPL lwip.
Kieran
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Manik, Raina (IE10), 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Manik, Raina (IE10), 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?,
Kieran Mansley <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Rod Boyce, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, John C. Toman, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Paul Sheer, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/09