[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?
From: |
Adam Dunkels |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ? |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:12:39 -0000 |
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 14:21, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> I think the BSD license works best for most of the real developers:
> they can submit important core changes/additions to lwIP, and
> keep platform/product specific stuff for themselves.
>
> The mailing list shows enough potential to improve and expand the
> lwIP source tree by some serious submitters. Choosing GPL will
> probably drive away some of these submitters from the project, as
> it is a bit too restrictive for companies to work with.
>
> As for the people who are violating the BSD license; they will
> probably also violate the GPL license, so I wouldn't expect
> any increase in feedback there.
>
> In short, I think BSD is a very common-sense license with the
> right attitude for people with the right attitude.
Very well put. Also, SICS does not have any interest in going over to
GPL.
/adam
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Manik, Raina (IE10), 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?,
Adam Dunkels <=
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Manik, Raina (IE10), 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Rod Boyce, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, John C. Toman, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Paul Sheer, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Should LwIP go (L)GPL ?, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/09