> BTW some compilers (or better some embedded libc) do not support the %p
> format specifier.
> Wouldn't it better to use %x instead ?
> GP
>
Better would be that %p is supported in the compiler. We do not always
want lwIP to adapt to the largest common denominator of all develop
tools out there.
The output of %p looks like %lx on some common platforms, but
on uC's with page/segment/offset based addressing schemes.
Maybe the question must be: to what C standard do we adhere?