Re: [Nano-devel] [Request] allow deleting a marked region without affecting the cutbuffer

[Brand Huntsman]

On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 20:49:51 +0200
Benno Schulenberg <address@hidden> wrote:

> But... this means that when you do cutbuffer = old_cutbuffer at the
> end, the temporary cutbuffer itself is "lost in space": it is leaked.

Oops, I originally modified update_undo() to move cutbuffer into the undo, 
instead of copying. But the code wasn't working and I forgot that cutbuffer 
would need to be freed without it.


> > I don't know how to fix this, but when zap is by copy, my help
> > items are paired and without the zap patch they aren't.  
> 
> Strange.  What compile options do you use?  That is: output of 'nano
> --version'.

 Compiled options: --disable-justify --disable-libmagic
 --disable-speller --disable-wrapping-as-root --disable-nls
 --enable-utf8