[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libpax?
From: |
Joerg Schilling |
Subject: |
Re: libpax? |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jun 2002 23:51:20 +0200 (MEST) |
>From address@hidden Sun Jun 23 23:37:10 2002
>> If you look at freshmeat it is easy to find libtar.... however it suffers
>> from the same bugs as PAX, GNU tar & GNU cpio. It definitely is a better
>> start because it is writen cleanly.
>Well, it uses a BSD license with advertising clause. This does not mean
>that I would completely object to using it (and neither am I the person
>who has to decide on that), but if we have the same functionality as
>part of GNU already, it seems a good idea to just use that.
I don't understand why you like to be compatible to GNU tar?
GNU tar is rather a big problem from a perspective of standard compliance.
The fact that GNU tar does not write long file names (*) in a standard compliant
way becomes more and more a real compatibility problem.
Even the latest alpha of GNUtar does not write compliant archives by default and
still has many problems with --posix (if you did run the compatibility test
you know more exactly).
Jörg
EMail:address@hidden (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
address@hidden (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
address@hidden (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix
- libpax?, Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/06/23
- Re: libpax?, Joerg Schilling, 2002/06/23
- Re: libpax?,
Joerg Schilling <=
- Re: libpax?, Joerg Schilling, 2002/06/24
- Re: libpax?, Joerg Schilling, 2002/06/24
- Re: libpax?, Joerg Schilling, 2002/06/25
- Re: libpax?, Joerg Schilling, 2002/06/25