[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] Oh yes! Indexed IRC logs!
From: |
shawn |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] Oh yes! Indexed IRC logs! |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:58:40 -0700 |
>On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 03:26:09PM -0700, address@hidden wrote:
>> perhaps you should rethink how you use X apps and which ones you use. This
>> way you wouldn't be so dependant on the rat. This seems like a cleaner
>> solution, and it has way less impact on ratpoison's binary size...
>
>I'm not going to use emacs. You won't get me there.
>
Other mouseless apps work...
>As most (all?) people on this list i prefer keyboard control in front
>of a pointing device. But the way software looks today it still is
>quite hard to disable both the clit and the touch pad. Sometimes you
>just have to use them. :(
Its an unfortunate and depressing reality, but adding mouse support to
ratpoison isn't going to make it better.
>Giving focus to the window under the cursor really is very standard
>and now when there is split screen i find it confusing that focus
>doesn't change when i try to. Of course i understand and all but it
>messes with my mind. I'm sure it does confuse a lot of others
>to. Especially new users.
The problem with focusing the window under the pointer is that you
then get a big fat cursor on your window. banishing the mouse with a
quick flick of the wrist or with :banish does a nice job of getting
the cursor out of my face. I haven't used unclutter but it could prove
useful in this case. Perhaps a command that focused the window with
the pointer in it could solve this...
Let us not forget that the window does have mouse focus...
>Donno why I'm writing this mail. It's not important enough for me to
>code it and noone else will do that either.
Good, good. Then its settled :)
looks like a microsoft support group (was Re: [RP] Oh yes! Indexed IRC logs!), Ryan Yeske, 2001/04/16