Re: [Swftools-common] version 1.0?

[filip sound]

well, if I'd donate x euro, would that mean that some developer will focus on a new release? if there is no motivation otherwise, the sense of open source got lost here. to me the last release (0.9.0) is not usable since it produces more objects than its predecessor with the same pdf input. so, i need to see improvement before I'm willing to donate. my boss already donated and i'm going to tell him again as soon as i get a version running that is better for my needs than the current one.

anyhow, thank you for your time and for swftools. without it, we be in deep trouble i guess.

filip

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Chris Pugh <address@hidden> wrote:

On 20 April 2010 16:09, Michael Haufler (scireum) <address@hidden> wrote:
> Yeah this is true,

What's all the fuss about having a One point Zero?

   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/swftools-common/2010-01/msg00037.html

> we are also waiting for the next release, and we are also willing to test
> the release candidate (with about 220k PDF pages).

That's a good enough  incentive?  Wow!! ;o)  Now.. if you were to say donate
x Euros per PDF page tested. maybe that'd be a way better one!  ( Why is it
that web sites with a commercial bias/angle still expect to be given stuff foc,
and invariably want it yesterday?   Or am I being a little unfair?)

Chris.

>
> Greetings
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> Von: swftools-common-bounces+mha=scireum.de@nongnu.org
> [mailto:swftools-common-bounces+mha=scireum.de@nongnu.org] Im Auftrag von
> filip sound
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. April 2010 16:48
> An: SWF Tools
> Betreff: [Swftools-common] version 1.0?
>
>
>
> hi,
>
> i'm wondering if the development of pdf2swf is dead or still going on. i can
> see minor fixes for single pdfs but not a new mayor release for a long time.
> will there be anything happening? will there be a version 1.0 some day?
>
> please let me know,
>   filip