Re: [Swftools-common] version 1.0?

[Chris Pugh]

Ok.. but maybe no longer under this particular thread.  Filip is getting
stressed! ;o)

Cheers,

Chris.

On 21 April 2010 13:06, Mark Lee <address@hidden> wrote:
>>Nor further argument from yours truly.
>
> Can't say I'd like that Chris. I've got some excellent info from your
> responses/arguments.
>
>
> Mark
>
> ________________________________
> From: Chris Pugh <address@hidden>
> To: Mark Lee <address@hidden>
> Cc: Swftools <address@hidden>
> Sent: Wed, April 21, 2010 7:53:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [Swftools-common] version 1.0?
>
> On 21 April 2010 12:44, Mark Lee <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Chris, don't get me wrong
>
> I wasn't actually.  But I did miss of the qualifying *;o)* !!
>
>>... as basically I'm supporting your point about learning and contributing.
>> (I've already offered to contribute translation of the technical info into
>> user
>> friendly language and am attempting to learn C++.)
>
> That makes two of us then!
>
>> However, there's a "but": car designers/makers, even if they do it for
>> free, are pleased when non-engineers can get in, turn the switch and drive
>> off without knowing about pistons and injectors.
>
> And usually complain when the car comes back in a wreck through user
> mishandling ( Note to Self: quit with the jokes Chris.. )
>
>> Most of us will only be able to pump gas, change wheels (hah!)
>
> Agreed - the latter is almost impossible when the wretched things have
> been put on with a air gun.
>
>> and sometimes remember to check the oil and washer fluid. It's good that
>> >a trucker can make some quick fixes when he's broken down but if he were
>> to spend weeks on fixing rather than grabbing another truck while the
>> expert
>> does the fixing, he'd be not using time as productively as he could. Yeah,
>> >just pay the expert.
>
> Understood. Point made and taken.  Nor further argument from yours truly.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Chris.
>
>